Rebuttal

Reciprocity is said to occur when a person opposes an action of an official by force or under threat of force. Consider, for example, resistance to a police officer. Recalcitrance in principle carries a maximum prison sentence of up to one year or a third-category fine (€10,300). Recidivism can be combined with assault or insult.

An example of reciprocity is the following situation. Imagine that a police officer stops someone for a routine check and asks for their ID. However, the person refuses to show his identity, gets angry, and begins to insult and push the police officer. This person is engaging in reprisal because he is actively resisting authority and obstructing the performance of the police officer's duty.

What does the article of law say regarding recrimination?

The law article criminalizing reciprocity, Article 180 of the Penal Code, reads as follows: 

'He who with violence or threat of violence opposes a public servant employed in the lawful exercise of his ministry, or persons who assist him in doing so pursuant to legal obligation or at his request, shall be punished as guilty of reprisal by imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine of the third category.' 

What punishments can be imposed for rebellion?

It is up to the judge to judge whether a criminal offense has been committed. If this is found to be the case, the judge will consider all the circumstances of the case in determining what punishment is appropriate and necessary. A defendant's personal circumstances are also important. The attorneys at Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Lawyers ensure that these circumstances are properly presented to the judge. The maximum prison sentence that can be imposed for rebellion is one year. However, the maximum prison sentence is by no means always imposed. 

A lawyer from Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Attorneys at Law can play an important role in the case of suspected bias. One of our lawyers can point out to the judge that there is too little evidence. In that case, acquittal should follow. Sometimes it happens that a defendant has confessed to a criminal offense. In that case, a lawyer from Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Advocaten may argue circumstances why a low(er) sentence should follow.

Is attempted reprisal punishable?

Attempting this crime is not punishable.

Exoneration for widowhood?

With regularity, suspects are acquitted of this crime. An example is shown below.

The judge acquitted a suspect because the charges were not legally and convincingly proven. The case file does not provide sufficient clarity on the course of events regarding the alleged resistance committed by the suspect during his arrest. 

Need a lawyer for spitefulness?

The attorneys at Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Lawyers are experienced criminal law specialists and can assist you at the time you are suspected of reprisal. Our lawyers will discuss with you the criminal case file and together with you determine a strategy that can achieve the success you desire. However, it is good for you to know that our lawyers do not bake sweet cakes; we give sound, honest and sincere advice. Should you have to appear in court, they will carefully prepare you for the hearing. The attorneys at Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Advocaten will ensure that you are represented in the best possible way during the hearing.

If you have any questions about this, please feel free to contact our office. You can send an e-mail to info@klpadvocaten.nl or (during office hours) call 020-6731548. In case of emergency (you or someone you know may soon be arrested), please contact us at our emergency phone number 06-24428734.

Want to read more about:


Other areas of expertise

team
Kötter L'Homme Plasman Lawyers

  Here the highest
possible level of
  legal assistance
      pursued 

December 3, 2025
In HLN verscheen een artikel over de ontuchtzaak tegen Marco Borsato, waarin mr. Peter Plasman namens het minderjarige slachtoffer optreedt. Plasman benadrukt dat de verdediging van Borsato probeert af te leiden van de kern van de beschuldiging door randverhalen. De strafrechtadvocaat stelt dat alle bijzaken irrelevant zijn: het gaat enkel om de vraag of Borsato het meisje ongepast heeft aangeraakt. Zijn cliënte vraagt geen celstraf of geld, maar erkenning.
November 24, 2025
Tijdens zittingsdag 6 in de strafzaak tegen ‘Walid’ hebben mr. Simcha Plas en mr. Jordi L’Homme betoogd dat Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft over de tenlastegelegde mensensmokkel. Volgens de verdediging zijn de feiten volledig in Afrika gepleegd en ontbreekt een concreet aanknopingspunt met Nederland. Ook zou de identiteit van de verdachte niet vaststaan en schiet het bewijs tekort: getuigenverklaringen verschillen sterk en zouden beïnvloed kunnen zijn door sociale media.
November 19, 2025
Op NOS verscheen een artikel over een strafzaak waarin mr. Simcha Plas en mr. Jordi L’Homme bijstand verlenen aan een cliënt die wordt verdacht van grootschalige mensensmokkel. Het Openbaar Ministerie eist twintig jaar gevangenisstraf tegen een 42-jarige Eritreeër die volgens justitie leiding gaf aan een gewelddadige smokkelorganisatie. De verdachte ontkent betrokkenheid en zijn advocaten voeren aan dat Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft.

Contact form

Please fill in your details in the form below and we will contact you as soon as possible.

EN