PIJ measure ("youth-TBS").

The PIJ measure, or Placement in a Youth Facility, is a drastic measure within the Dutch juvenile justice system. This measure is imposed on young people who have committed serious crimes and where there are behavioral problems and a high risk of repetition. In this article, we explain what the PIJ measure entails, how it works and in what situations it can be imposed.

What is the PIJ Measure?

The PIJ measure is designed for juveniles who have committed serious criminal offenses. The measure focuses not only on punishment, but mainly on treatment and reintegration. Young people are placed in a closed juvenile detention center, where they receive intensive supervision and treatment. This is sometimes referred to as "youth TBS," although it officially has a different legal status.

Comparison with Juvenile Detention

Although the PIJ measure is similar to juvenile detention, its objectives are different. Juvenile detention emphasizes punishment and isolation of the juvenile, while the PIJ measure focuses primarily on treatment and reintegration. The PIJ measure is imposed on juveniles between the ages of 12 and 23. The goal is to prevent recidivism and promote positive change.

Treatment and Counseling

During the PIJ sentence, youth receive supervision from a team of professionals, including psychologists, educators, social workers and teachers. This team helps youths address behavioral problems and develop skills that will help them beyond their stay in the facility. This includes therapies, educational programs and social skills training.

Purpose and Duration of the PIJ Measure.

The primary goal of the PIJ measure is to prevent the recurrence of criminal behavior by providing juveniles with intensive treatment. The measure is imposed by the court and evaluated regularly to determine whether continuation is necessary.

The measure is initially imposed for three years, with the first year being unconditional and the remaining two years being conditional. For serious crimes, the term can be extended to five years, with the last year as probation. If there are developmental or psychological disorders, the measure can be extended by two years. The maximum duration of the PIJ measure is seven years, the last year of which is conditional.

Examples of PIJ measure

The PIJ measure can be imposed in various situations, including:

  • Serious Violent Crime: Youth involved in serious violent crimes such as assault, robbery, or murder.

  • Sex crimes: Youth convicted of serious sex offenses such as rape or sexual abuse.

  • Serious Asset Crimes: Youth involved in serious property crimes such as robberies or burglaries with significant damage.

  • Repeated Criminal Behavior: Youth who have repeatedly exhibited criminal activity and previous interventions have not been effective.

  • Violent Behavior with High Recidivism Rate: Youth who were previously involved in violent incidents and show a high risk of recurrence.

Need a lawyer for PIJ measure?

Yes, it is very important to have an experienced attorney at a juvenile court hearing. The lawyer can help you prepare your defense, gather evidence, and give advice on possible next steps, such as appeal.

Do you have questions or have you received a subpoena for a multiple-chamber hearing? If so, please contact a specialized attorney. You can reach our office via email at info@klpadvocaten.nl or by phone during office hours at 020-6731548. In urgent cases, such as an impending arrest, please call our emergency phone number 06-24428734.

Other areas of expertise

team
Kötter L'Homme Plasman Lawyers

  Here the highest
possible level of
  legal assistance
      pursued 

December 4, 2025
Advocaat Micha Jonge Vos van Kötter, L’Homme & Plasman Advocaten staat een van de verdachten bij in een Delftse strafzaak waarin het Openbaar Ministerie spreekt van vermeende ‘maffiose incassopraktijken’. Zijn cliënt, Carlo M., zou betrokken zijn geweest bij een poging tot afpersing, maar Jonge Vos betwist de betrouwbaarheid van het door het OM gebruikte bewijs, waaronder zendmastgegevens. De rechtbank doet uitspraak op 17 december.
December 3, 2025
In HLN verscheen een artikel over de ontuchtzaak tegen Marco Borsato, waarin mr. Peter Plasman namens het minderjarige slachtoffer optreedt. Plasman benadrukt dat de verdediging van Borsato probeert af te leiden van de kern van de beschuldiging door randverhalen. De strafrechtadvocaat stelt dat alle bijzaken irrelevant zijn: het gaat enkel om de vraag of Borsato het meisje ongepast heeft aangeraakt. Zijn cliënte vraagt geen celstraf of geld, maar erkenning.
November 24, 2025
Tijdens zittingsdag 6 in de strafzaak tegen ‘Walid’ hebben mr. Simcha Plas en mr. Jordi L’Homme betoogd dat Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft over de tenlastegelegde mensensmokkel. Volgens de verdediging zijn de feiten volledig in Afrika gepleegd en ontbreekt een concreet aanknopingspunt met Nederland. Ook zou de identiteit van de verdachte niet vaststaan en schiet het bewijs tekort: getuigenverklaringen verschillen sterk en zouden beïnvloed kunnen zijn door sociale media.

Contact form

Please fill in your details in the form below and we will contact you as soon as possible.

EN