Lawyer 'animal porn' needed?

Article 254c of the Penal Code (Sr) criminalizes animal pornography and replaces the old article 254a Sr. This article has been modernized to better reflect current technological and legal developments. The main changes are replacing the term "image" with "visual representation" and replacing the term "lewd act" with "sexual act." The term "visual representation" is technology-independent and includes all possible forms of visual representations, both digital and physical. This is consistent with the new terminology also used in the criminalization of child pornography.

What is the possession of animal pornography?

A "sexual act" in the context of Article 254c refers to acts of a sexual nature that violate the physical integrity of an animal. This may include, for example, filming or photographing sexual acts between humans and animals, or acts involving the sexual abuse of animals. It is important to emphasize that the article punishes only acts that do not serve necessary medical or reproductive purposes. Animal pornography is thus treated on par with other forms of sexual crimes, with an emphasis on protecting the physical integrity of the creatures involved.

What is an example of criminal acts involving animal pornography?

A concrete example of conduct covered by Article 254c is producing or distributing a video in which a person performs sexual acts on an animal. This could include filming someone sexually abusing an animal and then sharing or selling this footage online. Such acts are punishable by up to six months in prison or a third-category fine, thus the article sets a clear boundary against the sexual abuse of animals.

What does the law article say regarding animal pornography?

  1. The person who distributes, openly exhibits, manufactures, imports, transits, performs, or possesses a visual representation of a sexual act involving or appearing to involve a human being and an animal shall be punished by imprisonment not exceeding six months or a fine of the third category.
  2. If the offense described in the first paragraph is committed by a person who makes it a profession or habit, imprisonment of up to one year or a fine of the fourth category shall be imposed.

Are you suspected of 'animal pornography'?

The attorneys at Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Lawyers are experienced criminal law specialists and can assist you at the time you are suspected of possessing or distributing animal pornography.

Our attorneys will discuss the criminal case with you and work with you to determine a strategy that will achieve the success you desire. However, it is good for you to know that our lawyers do not bake sweet cakes; we give sound, honest and sincere advice. Should you have to appear in court, they will carefully prepare you for the hearing. The attorneys at Kötter, L'Homme & Plasman Advocaten will ensure that you are represented in the best possible way during the hearing.

If you have any questions about this, please feel free to contact our office. You can send an e-mail to info@klpadvocaten.nl or (during office hours) call 020-6731548. In case of emergency (you or someone you know may soon be arrested), please contact us at our emergency phone number 06-24428734.

Read here more about what different sex offenses there are.

Other areas of expertise

team
Kötter L'Homme Plasman Lawyers

  Here the highest
possible level of
  legal assistance
      pursued 

December 4, 2025
Advocaat Micha Jonge Vos van Kötter, L’Homme & Plasman Advocaten staat een van de verdachten bij in een Delftse strafzaak waarin het Openbaar Ministerie spreekt van vermeende ‘maffiose incassopraktijken’. Zijn cliënt, Carlo M., zou betrokken zijn geweest bij een poging tot afpersing, maar Jonge Vos betwist de betrouwbaarheid van het door het OM gebruikte bewijs, waaronder zendmastgegevens. De rechtbank doet uitspraak op 17 december.
December 3, 2025
In HLN verscheen een artikel over de ontuchtzaak tegen Marco Borsato, waarin mr. Peter Plasman namens het minderjarige slachtoffer optreedt. Plasman benadrukt dat de verdediging van Borsato probeert af te leiden van de kern van de beschuldiging door randverhalen. De strafrechtadvocaat stelt dat alle bijzaken irrelevant zijn: het gaat enkel om de vraag of Borsato het meisje ongepast heeft aangeraakt. Zijn cliënte vraagt geen celstraf of geld, maar erkenning.
November 24, 2025
Tijdens zittingsdag 6 in de strafzaak tegen ‘Walid’ hebben mr. Simcha Plas en mr. Jordi L’Homme betoogd dat Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft over de tenlastegelegde mensensmokkel. Volgens de verdediging zijn de feiten volledig in Afrika gepleegd en ontbreekt een concreet aanknopingspunt met Nederland. Ook zou de identiteit van de verdachte niet vaststaan en schiet het bewijs tekort: getuigenverklaringen verschillen sterk en zouden beïnvloed kunnen zijn door sociale media.
EN