Opinion of lawyer Peter Plasman: 'Response of boss OM to Inez Weski is exactly as it should be: appropriate and concise'

Opinion of lawyer Peter Plasman: 'Response of boss OM to Inez Weski is exactly as it should be: appropriate and concise'

https://www.parool.nl/columns-opinie/opinie-van-advocaat-peter-plasman-reactie-van-baas-om-op-inez-weski-is-precies-zoals-hoort-gepast-en-bondig~b1f58b58

The boss of the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM), Rinus Otte, said he will not read lawyer Inez Weski's book. Journalist Paul Vugts thinks that is a weak response, but lawyer Peter Plasman disagrees, he writes in this submitted piece.

In Het Parool of June 28, Paul Vugts, whom I highly esteem, wrote about the soft line of the OM in Amsterdam, and the hard line of the top of that same OM. Put somewhat black and white: the difference between wanting (for years!) to do a lot but then half, or wanting to do less but then well.

According to Vugts, the highest boss of the OM, Rinus Otte, sees himself as a strong man, averse to criticism. This Otte states in NRC that he is not going to read Inez Weski's book and that, according to Vugts, is a weakness of this strong man, also because Otte did call Weski's claims 'quatsch' on television.

In an earlier column (April 25), under the title "To my surprise, I hear and read how many take Inez Weski's complaints to be true," Vugts wrote the following, among other things: "I also feel sorry for the many people involved in her arrest, detention, security and criminal proceedings, who are not allowed to defend themselves against her serious accusations because their bosses do not consider it chic. Who don't say something appropriately succinct like, 'It's nonsense and we'll prove that in the trial.'"

Her death

The term "quatsch," to which Otte added "complete nonsense," strikes me as exactly the appropriate, concise response from the top executive that Vugts missed in April. Incidentally, contrary to what Vugts now indicates, Otte did not call the claims in Weski's book quatsch on television; he reserved that term for Weski's claim that the Justice Department was out to kill her.

Vugts calls Weski's claims nonsense, the OM is accused by Weski of being out to kill her, quatsch according to Otte, and nevertheless, not reading that book would be a sign of weakness from the strong man Otte. Perhaps there are weaknesses in Otte - who said in NRC that he thinks only two things are very good about himself - but that does not include not wanting to read nonsense.

team
Kötter L'Homme Plasman Lawyers

  Here the highest
possible level of
  legal assistance
      pursued 

December 4, 2025
Advocaat Micha Jonge Vos van Kötter, L’Homme & Plasman Advocaten staat een van de verdachten bij in een Delftse strafzaak waarin het Openbaar Ministerie spreekt van vermeende ‘maffiose incassopraktijken’. Zijn cliënt, Carlo M., zou betrokken zijn geweest bij een poging tot afpersing, maar Jonge Vos betwist de betrouwbaarheid van het door het OM gebruikte bewijs, waaronder zendmastgegevens. De rechtbank doet uitspraak op 17 december.
December 3, 2025
In HLN verscheen een artikel over de ontuchtzaak tegen Marco Borsato, waarin mr. Peter Plasman namens het minderjarige slachtoffer optreedt. Plasman benadrukt dat de verdediging van Borsato probeert af te leiden van de kern van de beschuldiging door randverhalen. De strafrechtadvocaat stelt dat alle bijzaken irrelevant zijn: het gaat enkel om de vraag of Borsato het meisje ongepast heeft aangeraakt. Zijn cliënte vraagt geen celstraf of geld, maar erkenning.
November 24, 2025
Tijdens zittingsdag 6 in de strafzaak tegen ‘Walid’ hebben mr. Simcha Plas en mr. Jordi L’Homme betoogd dat Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft over de tenlastegelegde mensensmokkel. Volgens de verdediging zijn de feiten volledig in Afrika gepleegd en ontbreekt een concreet aanknopingspunt met Nederland. Ook zou de identiteit van de verdachte niet vaststaan en schiet het bewijs tekort: getuigenverklaringen verschillen sterk en zouden beïnvloed kunnen zijn door sociale media.
EN