Hemani's appeal may still proceed despite heavy accusation by lawyer in Insiya kidnapping case

Hemani's appeal may still proceed despite heavy accusation by lawyer in Insiya kidnapping case

The Parool, June 5, 2023

The lawyer of Shehzad Hemani, convicted of kidnapping his daughter Insiya, argues that the prosecution deliberately sent his summons on appeal to an incorrect address. The court does not share this opinion. As a result, the appeal can still proceed.

At Monday's pre-trial hearing, the court ruled that the subpoena had been properly delivered. Gerard Spong, lawyer of Shehzad Hemani, made the serious accusation against the public prosecutor. Spong spoke of "misleading" his client and believes that the public prosecutor should be declared inadmissible.

The court denied that request. The subpoena had been properly sent, the court said. Four witnesses will therefore be heard shortly. If a trial takes longer, it often results in a reduction in sentence, especially if it is due to mistakes made by the prosecution.

Hemani was sentenced to nine years in prison in 2020 for kidnapping his daughter Insiya in 2016. He was after the court's ruling himself appealed. That was supposed to be served in July 2022, but then did not go forward after it was revealed that Hemani's summons had not been properly served. The summons had been delivered to the wrong address.

The summons was supposed to be delivered to his home address. However, the summoning was done through the Indian authorities at Hemani's office, which is not according to the rules. The court then annulled the subpoena.

Spong claimed Monday that the prosecution delivered the subpoena "knowingly incorrectly. "Hemani's defense rights were thus deliberately violated," he said.

Staple

Spong argued again Monday that the summons for the appeal is void, and said the same is true of the summons for the hearing at the court in 2020. To that, he attached the consequence that that hearing at the district court must be reheard by the court.

The prosecution argued at the hearing that the subpoenas for the 2020 trial and appeal were properly delivered. "The summons was offered to the Indian authorities on time. I received no notice from them that they did not forward it to Hemani. Moreover, a client can be expected to be in touch about the handling of his case. He cannot claim that he was not informed. He filed his own appeal."

Sand in the wheels

Spong actually notified Hemani of the hearing at the court, he announced. Hemani did not appear at the appeal hearing. Nadia Rashid, Insiya's mother, and her brother did attend the pre-trial hearing.

Peter Plasman, Rashid's lawyer: "Hemani is doing everything he can to throw as much sand in the wheels as possible and thus avoid responsibility. For Nadia it has been a long time of agony and this agony continues, solely because of Hemani's disgraceful actions. Nadia still has no contact with her daughter."

Insiya was abducted from her grandmother's house in Watergraafsmeer by a team of people at Hemani's behest. The now nine-year-old girl has been staying with her father in India since she was two years old.

team
Kötter L'Homme Plasman Lawyers

  Here the highest
possible level of
  legal assistance
      pursued 

November 3, 2025
Bij de aanvang van het proces bij de Rechtbank Overijssel voerden mr. L’Homme en mr. Plas namens hun cliënt Walid aan dat het Openbaar Ministerie niet-ontvankelijk is, omdat hij in Ethiopië al is veroordeeld voor dezelfde feiten en Nederland geen rechtsmacht heeft over de Libische gebeurtenissen. Walid wordt door het OM bestempeld als een van de meest beruchte mensensmokkelaars ter wereld, maar de verdediging betwist dan frame met klem.
October 28, 2025
Advocaat Peter Plasman treedt op voor het vermeende slachtoffer in de strafzaak tegen zanger Marco Borsato. Plasman acht de geëiste gevangenisstraf van vijf maanden “afgewogen”, waarmee zowel de ernst van de feiten als het perspectief van het slachtoffer wordt meegenomen.
October 24, 2025
Advocaat Peter Plasman vertegenwoordigt het vermeende slachtoffer in de zaak tegen Marco Borsato. Het slachtoffer vraagt enkel erkenning van het onrecht – geen schadevergoeding of celstraf. Een mogelijke erkenning had de rechtszaak wellicht kunnen voorkomen.
EN